--- title: Sass 3.5 Release Candidate author: Natalie Weizenbaum date: 2016-08-30 15:00:00 -8 --- I've just pushed the button to release Sass 3.5.0-rc.1. If it seems like it's been a while since the last release, that's true! But there's a good reason. We decided to enter feature freeze after the 3.5 release to give [libsass](/libsass), the super-speedy C++ implementation of Sass, time to reach feature parity with Sass 3.4. Libsass is much younger than Sass, and C++ is generally a slower language to work in than Ruby, so this took some time. But it paid off: libsass is now almost 100% compatible with Ruby Sass, differing only in a few small bugs. After the feature freeze lifted, we were primarily focused on designing the new module system that will be the central feature of Sass 4.0. But we also found some time to add some new features, which are the focus of this release. ## CSS Custom Property Support Sass 3.5 now fully supports [CSS custom properties](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Using_CSS_variables). These posed a particular challenge for us, since the custom property syntax is *extremely* broad. You can put just about anything on the right-hand side. For example, this is totally valid, meaningful CSS: ```css .wacky-property { --property: .%(#@$~`^[^_+]<;:"}"|?)*+; } ``` In particular, this means that SassScript expressions are *also* valid CSS, which poses a problem for our goal of CSS compatibility. Wherever possible, we want valid CSS to mean the same thing in Sass as it does in CSS. So treating custom properties just like normal properties—which we did in 3.4—wasn't a good solution. Not only was some valid CSS interpreted differently, some of it wasn't even possible. The following CSS, taken straight from the Polymer docs, was next to impossible to represent in Sass: ```css :host { --my-toolbar-theme: { background-color: green; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid gray; } } ``` On the other hand, we needed *some* way of including dynamic SassScript values in custom properties. So we decided on a compromise: we'd treat custom properties like we do selectors and at-rule values, and only allow `#{}` as a means of including Sass values. While technically this is plain CSS, it's a very small surface area and it's very easy to escape, so we're not too worried. This means that in 3.5 you can write: ```scss :host { --my-toolbar-theme: { background-color: #{$toolbar-background}; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid gray; } } ``` ## New Data Type: First-Class Functions In preparation for the module system that's coming in Sass 4.0, 3.5 adds a new data type: first-class functions. This is just a way of referring to a function that's more specific than just its name. You can get a first-class function by passing its name to `get-function($name)`, and you can pass it to `call()` where you used to pass the function name. You might be wondering, "Why is this useful? I could already just pass the function name." Well, right now, Sass has global scope. All functions (as well as variables, mixins, and selectors) are visible to any code that's executing later on. This makes some things, like `call()`, simple, but it also causes a lot of problems. It's way too easy to accidentally overwrite a variable or function that was defined elsewhere, and it's way too hard to figure out where any given name was originally defined. We aren't quite ready to talk widely about our plans for the 4.0 module system, but one of the things we're sure of is that it won't use global scope. Each Sass file will only be able to see a limited number of the names that have been defined, and Sass libraries in particular won't be able to see anything defined by the end-user stylesheets that import them. First-class functions allow users to pass functions they define to libraries. Any stylesheets that are currently passing around function names as strings should switch to passing first-class functions instead. To this end, calling `call()` with a string has been deprecated. It won't actually break until 4.0, when it won't be much use anyway, but we strongly encourage users to switch to `get-function()` immediately. ## New Syntax: Bracketed Lists The new [CSS Grid Layout](https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/complete-guide-grid/) module added a new type of syntax: identifiers surrounded by square brackets. We're always striving to be totally compatible with CSS, which meant we needed to support these brackets as well. Here's what they look like in CSS: ```css .container { grid-template-columns: [first] 40px [line2] 50px [line3] auto [col4-start] 50px [five] 40px [end]; grid-template-rows: [row1-start] 25% [row1-end] 100px [third-line] auto [last-line]; } ``` The solution was clear: Sass already has a [list data type](/documentation/file.SASS_REFERENCE.html#lists), so we'd just allow lists to have square brackets. So `[first]` is just a list containing the unquoted string `first`. Like all Sass lists, bracketed lists can either be space-separated or comma-separated: `[foo bar baz]` and `[foo, bar, baz]` are both lists containing three elements. We've also added function support for bracketed lists. The `is-bracketed($list)` function returns whether a list is bracketed or not, and `join()` has a new `$bracketed` parameter that allows the caller to choose whether or not the resulting list will have brackets (by default, the result is bracketed if the first list is). ## Smaller Features We've added a `content-exists()` function that returns whether or not a content block was passed to the current mixin. This allows mixins to optionally take a content block, rather than having to define one mixin that takes content and one that does not. We've added the ability to add a trailing comma to argument lists. This matches the behavior of lists and maps. We've added a `$weight` parameter to the `invert()` function. This is a percentage between 0% and 100% that indicates how inverted the resulting color should be. It defaults to 100%. ## The Road to Release This is just a release candidate, but it's in a place that we'd be happy shipping it as the final release. We're not doing so because, now that we've reached feature compatibility with libsass, we're committed to staying there. Unfortunately, since [Marcel Greter moved on from the project](/blog/thank-you-marcel), libsass has been moving pretty slowly lately. If you or anyone you know would be interested in working on a project that would benefit thousands of people, we're still looking for new contributors! Until we have libsass compatibility, 3.5 will stay at a release candidate level. But don't let that stop you from trying it out and letting us know what you think! We're always interested in hearing feedback on [the mailing list](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sass-lang)!